Food inflation hits 18.3% (Economic Times dated 7th Jan 2011) says one headline. It certainly is not healthy and sustainable. And a side headline on the front page shows inflation linked NREGA wages now applicable. We are experiencing painful increase in inflation and particularly food inflation – representing shortage of supply, more money in people’s hand, less productivity, lots of exports that it causes scarcity, fewer imports than necessary, etc. The reasons can be any or combination of any of them.
The first thing notable in all this is, people now have more money in their hands – thanks to schemes like NREGA which pushed up the wage bar. Linking it with inflation will further add to the increase in inflation. If we look at the past one decade, in particular, there has been a tremendous increase in salaries in real terms, thanks to the IT revolution and service driven economy. The MNCs and Indian companies too do not mind shelling big bucks for the right talent. This is quite evident from the number of ‘commoner millionaires’ in cities. Increase in the number of companies, increase in the amount of business coming to India, increase in skills of employees, inelasticity of supply of talented human resources in the short term, etc are some of the factors responsible for ever increasing salaries.
The market forces of demand and supply play a very big role in increase of salaries in urban
Government is playing a big role in putting more money in hands of rural folks, particularly keeping vote bank in mind. Agriculture loan waivers, various subsidies, NREGA schemes, etc puts a lot of money in hands of a very large section of people, causing increase in demand for goods and services in rural
Of course, there is no way we can immediately increase the productivity of pulses, for example. In fact, there is no short term solution to this. Few steps to address food inflation are – to increase the productivity in agriculture, revamping the supply chain, providing adequate marketing, financing, elimination of middlemen, etc. Whatever progress we make in IT, we lag behind in agriculture. Let’s put our best minds to it. The country needs it.
Let’s view things a little differently. Why increase in salaries and wages increase inflation so much? Using no official or unofficial estimate – supposing for every 1000 salaried persons there is but one entrepreneur. The assumption seems realistic. Very few would venture out in the hectic and not-so- easy world of entrepreneurship.
Now increase in the income from business will not give as much push to demand as increase in salaries would give. Firstly, entrepreneurs are fewer than salaried persons. Secondly, entrepreneurs would like to reinvest the income depending upon the phase of growth the organization is experiencing. Thirdly, increase in salary is a wider phenomenon. Increase in salary for same services creates an industry wide increase. As a result, there is more money now in the hands of very large number of people. On the other hand, increase in income of an entrepreneur is due to his special efforts like – negotiations, contracts, contacts, after sales, etc. Notably, increase in macroeconomic factors like taxation, prices of raw materials, etc. have industry wide influence even in case of enterprises. Having said all that, salaries increase only when the businesses prosper. There is a time lag between boom in business and increase in salaries. If we look at IT companies, the most important resource is Human Resource. Given the kind of enviable operating margins IT companies have, it is quite natural that the business profits trickle down to the salary level quite fast indeed.
Let’s summarize. In case income from business increases, a very less base of population experiences increase in income in hand. But as businesses continues to prosper, salaries increase eventually, putting money in the hands of a very wide base of population.
As a result of the latter, you would see ridiculous real estate prices that you now see. Similarly, increase in demand for food items, hence the unsustainable food inflation; increased demand for automobiles; increased demand for fine dining; increased capacity to ‘waste away’ things
Who suffers the most as a result of all this? The answer is simple -- the one whose income is not linked to inflation. On the lighter side, auto rickshaw drivers in
The author does not argue whether increase in income of salaried is good or bad but tries to examine its effect.
Total population of

Great..
ReplyDeleteNice article.
ReplyDeleteTrue that increase in income is causing supply side pressures which is causing inflation. But, this also creates opportunities for people to fill the gap on supply side. For Eg, if the food inflation continues to be at higher levels, farming might be a profitable venture for people willing to take risk. Who knows, next generation may look at these areas as opportunities and make careers out of it.
Thanks Raghu for your comments. If you look at the total cost and total revenue, it is quite profitable still but intermediaries eat a lot of money in between. And next generation will still take time, this generation is already into it. I too have my eyes set on it :)
ReplyDeleteAn interesting read is an IIM grad opting out to be a vegetable vendor. You can read the details on http://www.freshplaza.com/news_detail.asp?id=24343
ReplyDeleteExcerpts from an interview in moneycontrol.com....
ReplyDeleteThe thing is that let’s look at two situations in which we have 8% or 8.5% WPI currently. One which is related purely to oil let us say. Ceteris paribus, everything else constant, oil goes up a lot and our inflation is 8.5%. Let us say everything else same, oil doesn’t go up, although it has gone up, but the real influence is vegetable and fruits and pulses. So, are we trying to say that both these inflations are identical in their impact on the world, I mean in the Indian market?
Inflation means loss of purchasing power, that is what inflation means. But sometimes it could be that inflation is helping the purchasing power of 50% of the public. So how will you relate? In one of them you just take the money, send it to five oil companies abroad or five countries abroad.
In another one, you give that money to some 40-50% of the same population. Now, it is bad for the balance, it is bad for some big picture, but that 50% purchasing power goes up relatively in the same market. That is why you see consumer growth going up, you see auto going up, you see mechanisation going up because labour is not available. So, to just say inflation high means auto sales will fall, but this time inflation is going up and getting money in the hands of the guys who are buying those autos, not autos, but the tractors or whatever and maybe a little bit of autos. So, to just paint everything this inflation number is high.
At least look at the components of that inflation, instead of giving a big picture issue on inflation and what exactly lead to that rise, some un-seasonal rains, some vegetables, etc.
I will try and answer from whatever limited i know of economics. The article talks particularly about food inflation. Inflation is when prices of goods increase. In India inflation is measured by Wholesale Price Index (WPI) which comprises of 450 commodities which have been assigned different rates. Food articles have 14.3% weight in WPI index. Fuel too has considerable weight. The pressure to increase prices can be from supply side or demand side. Who benefits from inflation? The one who has the goods stored at the old price and selling the goods at the inflated price. The increased income from be widely distributed or otherwise. In agriculture, farmers do not benefit much from the increased price. Most of them do not know about the right price most of the times. Lack of infrastructure adds to farmers' woes.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking in terms of economics, the basic food articles whose demand is inelastic to the price, increase in prices of such articles hits the poorest directly.